kristinberry

In Rizal’s “Love of Country,” he writes to unite the Filipino population in order to reclaim their country from oppressors. His language is hopeful in order to draw in even the most betrayed groups at the bottom of the social ladder. By telling everyone that no matter what your situation everyone should hold the same love and willingness to sacrifice in order to create a better country for the disenfranchised, he shows that this effort to love one’s country is not done in solitude. His dark rhetoric of seeing death as a positive goal is reiterated in his other piece “To The Young Women of Malolos.” Although religion has a strong presence in both essays, it is prominent in the latter as Rizal makes sure these women understand the difference between religion and faith. Although his intention from the outside may seem like he is praising them, there is a condescending tone throughout the letter implying that they do not understand the immoral ways of the religious leaders and that his words are ones of wisdom and should be followed so that they may be enlightened. Even though many see this essay as feminist literature, it is an example of how men that are educated in Europe can still view women with a certain stigma.
Unfortunately, I found Tedoro’s essay “The Philippine Press: Between Two Traditions” to be nothing creative. It is obvious the Philippine press was created to promote advocacy against occupational powers and social injustice – almost every press created during times of struggle is brought about for this reason.
I found Kawla’s story a little more interesting because he included the essay “Birds of Prey.” Whoever the real author of this piece may be, his message of hope is once again related to religion. He tries to reassure his people by saying even though the country seems to be in deep peril with no hope of independence, God will ultimately bring justice.

hola

just seeing if this is what we're supposed to be doing...